Networks: What, When and Why?

 

Learn from the people

Plan with the people

Begin with what they have

Build on what they know

Of the best leaders

When the task is accomplished

The people all remark

We have done it ourselves

- Lao-Tzu

 

 

What is a Network?

net·work – noun  “… a group or system of interconnected people or things.”

Networks are foundational to how we connect to our surroundings, each other, and the built environment. Ecological networks depend on the number and types of interactions between different species, food and water sources. Our families are networks of people who are related to one another through biological and social ties. We tap into online networks of computers that connect to one another and exist because of a network of power grids.

In some cases, we can explicitly cultivate networks to a particular end. In our work, we use network approaches to enable a group of organizations to work together to achieve a common purpose. We believe in the power of interorganizational networks to play a critical role in helping spread innovation and adapt to change. Having the capacity to adapt to change includes having the ability to harness knowledge and creativity to fashion unique responses, stimulate organizational learning, and sometimes embrace and successfully achieve transformational change (Sussman, 2004).

 

 

What is a Network Approach?

“Working with a network mindset means operating with an awareness of the webs of relationships you are embedded in. It also means cultivating these relationships to achieve the impact you care about.” 

– Monitor Institute (2011)

Successful organizational networks are not just connected organizations working together. High-quality networks work together in a particular way to achieve their purpose. Network approaches rely on building high-quality connections among network participants in order to achieve their collective goals (Bowie, 2009).  A network’s goals can vary. They could be designed to improve policy, create innovation, problem solve, share information, create a new intervention, or pool funding (Popp et al., 2014).

The interactions that a high-quality network requires are often different from the thinking habits, belief systems and structures that participants are used to. In fact, conventional ways of working often contribute to the problem that the network is seeking to solve. Networks work when they act as a container for social interactions that support the following mindsets:

 

Source: Government of Alberta CoLab (2016). "Follow the Rabbit: A Field Guide to Systemic Design", page 10.

When the whole network begins to exhibit these behaviours as the default culture, you have a high-quality network approach.

“Culture is a set of living relationships working toward a shared goal.  It’s not something you are. It’s something you do.”
-The Culture Code, Daniel Coyle

 

 

 

 

When and Why to Use a Network Approach

There are many approaches to working towards systems change. A network approach can be particularly resource and time intensive. There are several considerations to determine whether there is strategic value in taking a network approach. A network approach is most appropriate when:[1]

  • The problem you are trying to solve is not routine, linear, conventional, predicable or reinforcing the status quo. It is dynamic, emergent, unpredictable and challenges the status quo.
  • You can’t solve the problem by yourself.
  • The stakeholders have a high tolerance for failure, messiness, adaptation and learning.
  • No existing approach has been sufficiently successful.
  • There is a capacity and willingness to continuously engage broadly and deeply in the challenge the network is seeking to address.
  • There is a tolerance for the time it takes to think through problems and opportunities before jumping to ‘action’ that can be seen by others external to the network.
  • There is a willingness to take responsibility for the collective: people are willing to take on more for the benefit of all.
  • Despair and complacency are not options

[1] This list is drawn from material created by the Human Venture Institute.

 

 

Network Success

“Network outcomes are different from organizational, population or client outcomes; Rather, network outcomes are intermediary outcomes that reflect the way that organizations interact, share resources, and implement work.  Network outcomes are process outcomes.” 

– Danielle Varda, Visible Network Labs

Part of a network’s success is building a high-quality network that can achieve its long-term goals. Success within a network is defined by the quality of the relationships within it. Successful networks foster a sense of personal resiliency, self–agency, community belonging, and social connectedness amongst those involved. (Bowie, 2009). Fundamentally, networks need to stay focused on human relationships built on trust, authentic processes, transparency, mutual value and reciprocity (Varda et al., 2008; Hicks, 2008). Networks are ultimately made up of human beings, and to the extent they enable the people involved to learn, grow and become empowered to contribute to the collective change we seek – the network – and all of us – succeed.

In addition to their long-term goals, at their best, networks (Holley, 2018):

  • Increase participants’ awareness of new information and access to new resources.
  • Build diverse relationships that can broaden perspectives, link people across traditional divides, and stimulate new ideas.
  • Expand a sense of responsibility, develop leadership capacity (outside of conventional structures) and empowerment.
  • Demonstrate the benefit of working and learning together.
  • Create opportunities for scale and impact beyond what one organization could accomplish.

Networks can be incredibly useful vehicles for social change. They offer a different way of working together that challenge our habits and the status quo – often the very things preventing the changes we seek.

 

“The electric light did not come from the continuous improvement of candles”

– Oren Harari

 

 

References and Key Resources

Bowie (2009). Why networks matter: A new way to approach child safety in Los Angeles.

Bowie (2011). Getting to scale: The elusive goal. Magnolia Place Community Initiative.

Ehrlichman et al (2018). Cutting through the complexity: A roadmap for effective collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Government of Alberta CoLab (2016) Follow the rabbit: A field guide to systemic design.

Hicks et al (2008). The influence of collaboration on program outcomes: The Colorado Nurse Family Partnership. Evaluation Review (32) 453.

Holley (2018). Why Networks?

McCarthy et al. (2017). Insights from deploying a collaborative process for funding systems change. The Foundation Review.

Ogden (2018). 25 behaviors that support strong network culture. Interaction Institute for Social Change.

Popp et al (2014). Inter-organizational networks: A review of the literature to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government.

The Monitor Institute (2011). Catalyzing networks for social change: A funder’s guide.

Skillern et al (2010). Cracking the Network Code

Sussman (2004). Building adaptive capacity: The quest for improved organizational performance.

Tamarack Institute (2017). Turf, trust, co-creation and collective impact.

Varda et al. (2008). Core dimensions of connectivity in public health collaboratives. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 14(5)

Visible Network Labs. Network leadership: Lessons from the field webinar series.